Flamingo, F. Cockatoo, C. Galah, G. Macaw, M. Toucan, T.
In this paper, we explore the epistemological implications of the linguistic abilities of parrots. Using a sample of one particularly verbose and opinionated parrot named Polly, we analyze the reliability of Polly's proclaimed knowledge against established philosophical paradigms. Our findings suggest that Polly's epistemic claims are largely unsubstantiated and, furthermore, may be influenced by a predilection for crackers and shiny objects. We recommend future research explore the impact of increased seed consumption on Polly's ability to reason logically.